Less Government, Fewer Laws and More Freedom!

In a growing world, there is a general cry for smaller government and less interference with daily living.  In a complicated society such as ours, this seems to make good sense.  After all, history is wrought with examples of powerful, corrupt leaders and governments oppressing the masses, stripping them of property and wealth,, and promoting their own self interests.  In the United States, some argue that this doctrine of “less government” was the desire of our founding fathers and that we need only to examine the Constitution to affirm it’s so.  But is that possible?

Aristotle examined and defined governments into five (5) categories:  aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny.  Save for tyranny, for any of these forms of government to be a government, whether it’s a monarchy, oligarchy, democracy, social republic or federal republic, certain rules apply.  These rules, when accepted by the established individual or individuals in charge, become laws . . . laws which aid in the governance of the particular state, country or kingdom.  Those in authority then develop methods of enforcing the laws and this is where the trouble begins.  Very few people like being told what to do or how to do it, unless it’s something they want to do or they truly believe in the idea.  So, is all this necessary?  Do we really need government or even laws to survive and function in the world?  Let’s examine what many consider to be the first government.

If you are one to interpret the Holy Bible in literal terms, you believe that the first two true humans on Earth were Adam and Eve.  In a male dominated scripture, Adam was created first and Eve followed shortly thereafter.  Before Eve arrived on the scene, Adam pranced around naked in the Garden of Eden, playing with all of God’s other magical critters and all was well.  Adam could do pretty much as he damned well pleased, as there was no government, no laws, no cares, no taxes, no work and not a care in the freshly created planet.  After God ripped a rib from Adam and formed Eve, the plot thickened quicker than your grandmother’s gravy.  Things got lumpy in a hurry!

With only two people on the Earth, God felt it necessary to set down some rules or laws.  At first, things were simple as God simply told Adam and Eve not to eat the apples that swung from the Tree of Knowledge.  That didn’t last very long when, after a brief chat with Satan, Eve decided to chow down on the forbidden fruit.  Of course, as a good “wife,” she nagged the hell out of Adam until he munched an apple too, and after the shit hit the fan and they were tossed out of the Garden, Eve exclaimed, “The Devil made me do it!”  Society went to the proverbial “Hell in a hand basket” after the first son murdered their second son and ran away to Nod to marry some shameless hussy, who was probably created by some “false god.”  Oh boy, more laws.  Now God said you can’t kill people, covet your neighbor’s wife, steal things, et cetera, or anything else we consider fun stuff.

Now, whether you believe the Bible’s version of the creation of man and woman is immaterial, but fact or fiction, it demonstrates that from the beginning of history, humankind recognized the need for law and order.  Whether you force it upon people as an evil dictator, enforce it as a series of laws, or somehow find a group of people with the capacity of true self control, the concept of government and its authority over people is required in a civilized world.  Anything else is a form of government Aristotle didn’t include in his classification– anarchy!

While anarchy may sound like a lot of fun, it sort of parallels what the character Malcolm said in the movie Jurassic Park.  First there’s the “oohing” and “aahing”; then comes the screaming and dying.  At any rate, no government is perfect since they are administered  by people and persons who, no matter how dedicated and pure, over time, begin to believe they really are above the rest.

So if a bunch of biblical scholars recognize that in a world of two people, somebody’s going to break the law, it’s no wonder that in our little “Garden of Eden” of six billion plus things are a hell of a mess.  Not much of a chance anyone on this planet is going to see smaller government real soon!

Posted in Law and our society!, Politics, Real life | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Less Government, Fewer Laws and More Freedom!

Oh I Wish I Was A “Carlos Danger” Wiener!

There’s one that represents you.  Maybe he or she lives nearby.  Maybe he or she represents a handful of people, may be millions.  Who you ask?  The self-serving politician!  Not all politicians are bad, especially on the local level, but the rise in selfish men and women seeking and holding political office is alarming.  They’re easy to spot, as they attend meetings and gatherings with no regard to the truth or common sense.  Concerned only with policies and laws that serve their own interests and agendas, they mill about shaking hands with constituents, drink in one hand, cigarette in the other, espousing causes they don’t believe in and pontificating on subjects about which they know nothing.  Ironically, the worst they are, the easier they are to spot, as they talk about virtue and family values . . . families they obviously ignore or despise as they are never home.  Families that attend political functions and express fake smiles, strained conversations and struggle not to reveal any secrets, from alcoholism to kicking the family dog.

Then along comes Anthony Wiener, the sexting machine that is so “out of bounds” in his behavior that it’s almost laughable.  The man admits sending inappropriate sexual texts to women and added a little spice to the messages by attaching a few photos of the “little Wiener.”  What idiot wouldn’t want to crawl in a hole and pull it in after himself after being caught in such a sordid sixth grade escapade.  Consider, however, that this man was a U.S. Congressman.  Tax money well spent on a smart phone.

Now, not only is the former Congressman/professional political pervert not digging a large hole in his backyard to hide, he is running for New York City Mayor.  Apparently his balls are too big to fit into a text message or we could add that to the long list of indiscretions.  His defense?  He said, “Look, I made a some big mistakes, and I know I let a lot of people down.  But I’ve also learned some tough lessons…. I hope I get a second chance to work for you.”  There you go, just apologize and all is forgiven!  This seems of be the great American political pastime . . .  saying you’re sorry and then moving on like nothing happened.  Ole’ Tony continued his sexting ways, however, even after resigning from Congress, so the only “tough” lesson he learned was say you’re sorry, run for office, keep taking snapshots of your tallywacker, hit <send>.

But wait, there’s more!  Rudeness and stupidity are the signature characteristics of the “Wiener for Mayor” campaign as spokeswomen Barbara Morgan unleashed a profanity-ridden tirade against an intern this week.  Whoops!  Time to say, “I’m sorry!” again and ask for forgiveness.  Morgan tweeted a photo of a swear jar she just set up to commemorate the event.  She said, “Not my best day yesterday. Should’ve known better, been better.  Gotta pay up.”  That’s it?  An apology and a little joke?  Perhaps Zimmerman’s attorney can show up with another “knock, knock” joke.  By the looks of the jar below, Morgan is simply going to shovel money in it so she can bash interns unfettered.

There’s no doubt that New Yorkers will rise up and swat this pest down like a common house fly.  New York already has its fill of sexual deviants, and New Yorkers will be in a really bad mood for a long time over the A-Rod scandal.  The voters aren’t up for any more drama.  And if he loses this contest, he’s not done yet!  He can run incognito with his sexting moniker, Carlos Danger!  NO one will be the wiser!

Posted in Celebrity and Fame, Law and our society!, Politics, Real life, Ripped from the headlines | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Oh I Wish I Was A “Carlos Danger” Wiener!

Truth, Justice and the American Way

Advertising is persuasive.  Whether it’s called propaganda, mind control, brainwashing, menticide or thought reform, it all adds up to pretty much the same thing.  If you want someone else to believe in something, to use your product or to buy whatever it is you’re selling, you advertise.  It is particularly effective in merchandising, politics, and law, but a new type of advertising is evolving as news and information is beamed to our fingertips from around the world in seconds– social advertising!

Advertising need not be flashy to be effective.  When George Reeves put his fists on his hips in the opening of the 1950’s TV series The Adventures of Superman! and announcer Willard (Bill) Kennedy spoke these immortal words,”(he) fights a never-ending battle for truth, justice and the American way,” everyone at home knew that truth and justice were certainly synonymous with the American way.  That’s just good advertising and no one can accuse producer Robert Lippert of being flashy when he poses a chunky middle-aged man in front of a camera wearing tights and granny pants.

In a stroke of genius, Procter and Gamble strung together what was supposedly two advertising slogans for their brilliant campaign, “It’s 99 44/100ths percent pure!  It floats!”  They repeated this message so often that we were led to believe that because it was pure, it floated.  The truth of the matter was that it floated because it was “soft-milled,” a process that injected air into the soap making it lighter than water.   It used less soap, which is why Procter and Gamble could sell four bars for the price of three bars of its competitors soap.  On the other hand, shit floats because it is pure shit.

Now, the social advertising scheme is in full swing.  What is social advertising?  It is the flood of information pouring in and out of hand-held devices to get you to think, buy and act a certain way.  Lately, the justice system is being hoisted by its own petard regarding the Zimmerman trial.  Social media are firmly split into two groups, those who believe Travon Martin was unjustly gunned down, and those who believe that George Zimmerman was right in killing the young man.  Now these groups are expressing their beliefs for all to read– in essence, advertising their opinions attempting to sway you and I into their way of thinking.

Before personal mass media, this was nothing new in the justice system.  Lawyer and writer Lawrence B. Fox considered this observation in his book, “There Is No Justice, Just Court Costs,” when he wrote that two types of people leave a courtroom– the first group are happy, smiling folks exalting the wheels of justice when they win and the second group are grimacing, sad-faced individuals spitting out epithets such as “It’s not fair!” and “There is no justice!” After leaving the courthouse, these cheers and jeers died away, never to be heard again, but if it were a major trial, some press coverage might be reviewed at the water cooler for the next few days.  Today, with little provocation, any trial can become a national campaign.

And so it is with the George Zimmerman/Travon Martin issue.  Throngs gather in the streets demanding justice and investigations.  This is wrong.  We weren’t there.  We can render an opinion, but it should stop there.  None of us were at the scene of the crime, nor did we listen to the testimony presented to the jury.  We have no right to act on issues we know nothing about.  What we are doing as a society is advertising a massive and infectious disrespect for justice.  Justice is not right or wrong, but simply a tool.  Like all tools, it can break and whether that was an issue here remains to be seen.  What is apparent is the lack of competent representation for the prosecution, particularly in California.  When O.J. Simpson was on trial, prosecutor Marcia Clark couldn’t convict O.J. for a weed violation with the evidence presented.  The rush to judgement must end because due process takes time.  Even though he was not convicted, O.J. is suffering for the rest of his life, and this, too, seems to be the plight for Zimmerman.  This is justice, right or wrong.  And we must respect that whether we feel justified or not.  And if all else fails, close the door, relax and turn on an episode of The Adventures of Superman!

Posted in Celebrity and Fame, Law and our society!, Politics, Real life, Ripped from the headlines | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Truth, Justice and the American Way

Celebrate, Libate and Irritate

When you’re late for a party, walk in and find everyone well on his or her way to being drunk, it’s not much fun.  It’s still fun for them, but being sober when everyone else is drinking is a disadvantage.  First, everyone is acting in a ridiculous fashion, or so you think, because you are a temporary teetotaler in control of your faculties.  Second, playing “catch-up” in the drinking world isn’t fun, either, unless you’re still in college and play“drink-one-beer-every-twenty-minutes” for the rest of the evening, which is just part of the charm of higher education.  And lastly, drunk people are irritating as hell when you’re sober.

Songwriter and singer, Pink, found out the hard way when she hosted a party at her home where everyone was drinking but her.  She wanted everyone to leave, but her guests, being drunk of course, wanted to stay.  In frustration, she headed out to the beach with the words, “Why do I feel so good sober!” stuck in her head, inspiring her hit tune, “Sober,”which sold about 3 or 4 million copies to date.  Drunk or sober, anyone would feel good about that.  I’m thinking of hosting a party were I don’t drink.

Partying and drinking are not what they used to be these days.  In the 1950’s and 1960’s, visiting friends and colleagues for dinner parties included throwing back a few cocktails, and weekend picnics and barbeques always included plenty of cold beer and wine.  Afterwards, the inebriated guests would pile into their cars and drive themselves home because they were too drunk to walk.  And even on the slim chance that you might encounter a cop along the way, no big deal, as the local enforcement staff were probably at the party with you.

As the sixties generation began getting on in years, its members bore little ones which they believed were truly created in “God’s image.” As these little tikes began to grow, fear swelled in the hearts of the former “free love, wine-bottle toting, bone token” adults who, when they flash backed to their teens, realized these precious spawn may not survive the upcoming onslaught of drunken teens about to join the millions of intoxicated baby boomers already on the highways.  Alas, the 1970’s became the decade of sober transition as large groups of people really believed that they can shame people into not drinking!  Although alcoholic beverages are no longer in vogue, more people are drinking than ever.  Why?  Perhaps drunk people find sober folks as irritating as the reverse!

Anti-alcohol is a big industry . . . a really big industry.  An industry that thinks that shame and marginalization of drinkers will reduce, even eliminate, consumption.  Surveys show that areas that are bombarded with anti-liquor propaganda result in an increase of alcohol consumption.  Apparently, after watching these commercials, people are compelled to get a drink, or these ads provide enough time to grab another beer.  Below is a list of a few organizations trying to turn you away from the evil spirits and toward water, juices and sugary soft-drinks:

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,
Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA)
Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth (CAMY)
Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI)
Coalition for the Prevention of Alcohol Problems
Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)
Office of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse (AMA)
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)
Marin Institute
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence
American Council on Alcohol Problems (formerly the Anti-Saloon League, then the Temperance League)

It’s true that something must be done.  May I suggest a few ground rules for both the teetotaler and the imbiber.

Now, if you don’t drink, or you do, but don’t show up at parties on time, do not attend a party where alcoholic bevs are served.  For you teetotalers, there are plenty of “sober parties” now and if you can’t find one, check on Google or call one of the groups listed above.  If you’re just late, drink a couple for the road, or take a six-pack with you, park in front of the party and kick back a couple of cold ones before going inside.  Then when you’re groped, kissed, fondled and squeezed by a bunch of drunks,  well . . . you’ll feel a lot better.

For those who don’t want to be groped, kissed or hugged by harmless drunks, please, for everyone’s sake, go to your little sober party, drink tea, eat paté on crackers and do whatever it is you do at these things.  I’ll be at the other party.  And I’ll be on time!

Posted in Fantasy Fun, Law and our society!, Real life | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Celebrate, Libate and Irritate

Requiem for the Rod of Asclepius!

Poet and playwright, William Congreve, wrote “Musick has Charms to soothe a savage Breast,” in the tragedy, The Mourning Bride, and although the author refers not to a physical part of the body, the quote seems timely considering the preventive surgery performed on Angelina Jolie in April.  Most Hollywood insiders lauded the movie star for her brave decision to bob her breasts and many women in the general public agreed, particularly those at risk, those already enduring breast cancer treatment or breast cancer survivors, that this is a brave and sensible move.  As the chatter from bloggers and columnists continued through the month of May, most supported the move, but some negative comments arose.  In fact, an explosion was heard when Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Editor of Naturalnews.com, unleashed an unflattering diatribe regarding the removal of Jolies’ orbs on May 15th.  This inspired Dr. David Gorski of Scienceblogs.com to unleash his brand of spew against the opinions of Adams and in support of the actresses’ decision.

Read Mike Adams article here!

Not all the critics are men, as demonstrated by Ruth Fowler’s article, Angelina Jolie: Privilege, Tits and Being Dumb published on her website, The World Breaks Everyone! Her viewpoints as a woman are interesting enough, but as a self-professed sociopathic narcissist, she hammers Jolie for a living a privileged life in the final paragraph by stating:

“You know what, Angelina. It sounds like you’ve had a hard time recently. I guess I can forgive the complete absence of awareness in your privilege-denying Op-Ed, because after all, it’s hard to understand that some Americans – yes, not only black and brown Americans, but white ones too! – can be just as deprived as those brown people in foreign countries you’re so invested in “saving”. When the fuss has died down about your elaborately reconstructed chest and your incredible bravery in submitting to top-end, essential, preventive medical treatments in order to avoid a painful and abhorrent death, perhaps you’ll do the decent thing and spend some of your vast resources on addressing some of the issues you seem pretty ignorant about right now.”

Apparently, it isn’t enough to just say that cutting off healthy breasts is stupid.  You need to whip up a little attitude and show everybody how angry you are no matter what side of the fence you reside.  And that’s why The Mourning Bride is so appropriate.  Like the character Almeria in play, Angelina Jolie is looking for that “Musick” that will be the “Harmony to calm (her) Griefs.”  Whether Jolie is privileged over others where both affordability and support are beyond question may not be the issue here.  Removal of healthy tissue before its time is the question.  Do doctors and surgeons know enough about the risks and the genetic propensities of disease to offer such opinions?  Is the genetic code in otherwise healthy tissue an automatic death sentence or are there other options?  Doesn’t examination and a program of cancer-risk analyses, even if it’s extreme, suffice or even preclude preemptive surgery?  These are questions to ask your doctor, your surgeon, your family and most importantly, yourself.

Doctors and surgeons need to search their souls, also.  They took an oath to “do no harm,” and although that is a very general statement in this regard, it’s worth examining . . .  examining whether women like Angelina Jolie will ever find peace or that Musick she seeks to soften her fears.  And, for the doctors, what of the Hippocratic Oath . . .  and the Rod of Asclepius?

Posted in Celebrity and Fame, Real life, Ripped from the headlines, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Requiem for the Rod of Asclepius!

Philly to English; English to Philly!

Charles Berlitz, linguist and language teacher, garnered a fortune developing books and courses teaching people to speak languages other than their own.  When I studied German in high school and college, I made it a point to tuck a pocket-sized Berlitz:  German to English/English to German Dictionary somewhere in my books or on my body.  Berlitz was a brilliant guy (graduated Yale magna cum laude)  and spoke about 8 languages fluently before he was thirteen.  Berlitz did miss one important factor regarding language and that was the accents.  Not everyone in every country really speaks the language the same way.  In fact, in some countries, citizens of one city can hardly communicate with folks in another city.  The cities of Munich (München) and Cologne (Köln) are an example, where deutcher and deutcherin must listen to each other carefully to be understood.

Some of these differences in speech throughout the world are so pronounced that they border on being dialects, and because of its sheer size, accents within the United States seem to be the most numerous and humorous.  Accents are defined as pronouncing certain words with shared characteristics within a certain locality.  England, of course, doesn’t recognize anything spoken in the United States as English, calls it American, and considers it a crude dialect, at best.  The denizens of New England, who recognize no one, cannot pronounce anything with a “a” or “r,” but whether it’s English, American English, or an English dialect, there are some entertaining accents that are difficult to fathom to the casual listener.  If you’re a foreign traveler in the states of New England, Texas, Georgia or Tennessee, you might find yourself scratching your head as to why you’re little language dictionary is coming up short when you listen to the local inhabitants.  Other areas of the country don’t get as much attention regarding accents like, Southern California, Michigan, New York and Philadelphia.  Philadelphia?  Yes, Philadelphia, the land with one the the most annoying accents in the country.  And they are not getting the credit they deserve.

Philadelphians and the folks in the geographic attachment called “South Jersey,” are easily identified by the fact that they are from “Philly” or “South Jersey,” not Philadelphia or Southern New Jersey.  When they do say “Philadelphia,” they tend to swallow the ells (L’s), skip an “a” and say “Fil del fia.”  Southern New Jersey citizens are from “Sowth Jurzee.”  And no one from New Jersey says “Joissee.”  This is a dialect created by the bastardization of the Brooklyn New York accent and is widely publicized in TV and movies characterizations implying that all Mafia members talk like this.  Trust me, all organized crime members I’ve met in New Jersey speak Philly.

The secret of speaking like a “Philly Delphian” is to pull the tongue back and away from the roof of mouth when speaking certain sounds, like “d” and “l” which allows you to literally swallow the sound and not project it, or eliminate it altogether.  To complete the accent, you must not enunciate, but speak as if you are practicing ventriloquism, keeping your lips close together.   The word Saturday is a good example.  First, the day part of the word is pronounced “dee,”  so the days of the week are Mondee, Tuesdee, Wednesdee and so on, but Saturday is special.  Pronounced “Saa-er-dee” it is the pinnacle of the Sowth Jursey/Philly accent.  Any “o” or “ow” sound at the end of a work is simply reduced to a grunting short “a,” like “winda,” “yella,” and the ever popular Jersey “tomata.”  Ironically, any “o” or “a” near the beginning of the word, like crab, Coke, or, dare I mention, hoagie, is conversely pronounced with a long “o” or “a.”

Now, being able to speak any kind of English or American without opening your mouth or allowing your tongue to not touch your upper palate is a tribute to the strength of the throat muscles of Philly folks and their surrounding neighborhoods. But this is no surprise if you watch a local denizen eat a Gino’s cheese steak while guzzling copious amounts of beer. Such a diet of sticky, slippery fatty foods are excellent practice. The video below is a fair representation of the South Jersey/ Philly accent. Pay particular attention to the pronunciation of hoagie, water and out.

As you can see, Berlitz missed a great opportunity to expand his language business by not printing dialect and accent conversion dictionaries.  A few of the words that would appear in the Philly to English, English to Philly handbook are as follows:

Tomato –  tomata

Window – winda

Yellow –  yella

Water – wudder

Wheelbarrow  –  wheelbarrel

Toilet –  hopper

Crab – crābe

Ice – īce

Isn’t  – indnt

Coke – cōke

And remember, if it sounds at all like a New York accent, it’s phonier than a New York City cheese steak. It’s not genuine Philly!

Posted in It's part of the language!, Real life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Philly to English; English to Philly!

One Man’s Dandelion Is Another Man’s Daisy!

The dandelion is a much misaligned little flower with a bad rap! In North America, it is one of the earliest plants to bloom in the spring, dotting lawns and landscapes with its bright yellow flowers. As beautiful as this flower presents itself, U.S. homeowners spend millions of dollars per year to rid their yards of this non-lethal, non-damaging plant. Why? The answer can only be obsession! Americans would rather spend their money for a green, flawless field of grass than save for a college education. Not only do they want it green, but well-kept.  Drive through any American neighborhood or development, lower the windows and turn off the engine (unless you drive a Prius). I’ll bet credits to Navy beans that you’ll hear at least one lawn mower, probably more.

So how did Americans become so obsessed with spending their free time riding around their lawns cutting, feeding and re-fueling?  According to an article published in 2011 by theweek.com entitled, Blades of Glory:  America’s Love Affair with Lawns, the Europeans made us do it.  It is often said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but since rich colonial Americans were no more than Europeans on an extended vacation, it really wasn’t imitation that folks like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson thought about.  Nobles and aristocrats of 17th- and 18th-century Europe started the lawn industry with the first mowers consisting of goats, sheep and servants.  Louis XIV of France upped the ante with his tapis vert, or “green carpet” in the Versailles gardens.  Such squares of green were a status symbol for the rich and powerful, and for good reason–  one needed a constant supply of fresh goats, sheep and servants to maintain these delightful, around-the-house (or palace) oases.  It only made sense that men of means, such as Washington and Jefferson, could maintain such expensive patches at Mount Vernon and Monticello, respectively.

After the Civil War and the advent of suburban housing, lawns appeared on the properties of those who were less fortunate than Washington or Jefferson.  Since then, the idea of comfort and success in the United States means looking out your front door and gazing across a weed-free, almost perfect lawn!  A lawn to die for, a lawn that is the envy of your neighbors, a lawn for the kids to play and roll around, and a lawn for the dog to crap on.

This leaves the dandelion out in the cold.  According to Richard Mabey, a naturalist and author, dandelions are on a long list of floral blemishes such as crabgrass, clover, chickweed and so on.  Clover!  Really?  Anyway, a plant that is completely compatible with a carpet of green, the dandelion, seems to be the archenemy of tough-on-weeds turf turds.  In the words of Richard Mabey, “Weeds are plants that sabotage human plans.”  Apparently, all lawns must be uniform except for the purposely placed flower bed or occasional white birch.  No room for little dots of yellow, the dandelion.

The dandelion belongs to the genus Taraxacum of the Asteraceae family.  The word “dandelion” derives its name from the French dent-de-lion which means “lion’s tooth.”   But the most interesting fact about this little lawn pest is that is completely edible, from its tasty little flowers, down to the brittle taproot.  As a vegetable, the dandelion is rich in  vitamins A, B complex, C, and D, and minerals such as iron, potassium, and zinc.  Medical centers are testing dandelions as possible diuretics, appetite stimulants and for treatment of liver and gall bladder problems.

Native Americans used dandelions to treat kidney disease, swelling, skin problems, heartburn, and upset stomach, while the Chinese treated stomach problems and appendicitis, with the powerful herb.  Europeans used the flower’s parts for fever, boils, eye problems, diabetes, and diarrhea.  Try doing that with a  daisy or a zinnia!

So as an army of riding prodigal mowers chop, munch and deposit smithereens of dandelion all over yards or into clippings bags, think of the much maligned lawn guest called the dandelion.  Instead of pouring chemicals and poisons on our yards each year, perhaps we should take something back . . . and enjoy a salad, soup or a glass of wine from  a little plant that is so rich and so willing to give . . . the lowly “lion’s tooth.”

Posted in It's part of the language!, Real life, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on One Man’s Dandelion Is Another Man’s Daisy!

The Dark Age of Modern Medicine!

We the people of the world are entering a dark age in the world of medicine.  The last and best known Dark Ages occurred between the end of the Roman Empire and the beginning of the Renaissance.  It was also known as the Middle Ages or the “Age of Faith.”  Ridiculed as a time of ignorance and superstition, the Dark Ages are parodied by many logical minds as a time when “religion ruled the world.”  There is some truth to that cruel joke, but the idea of a  “Dark Age” started with Petrarch, a Christian writer, who metaphorically compared “good versus evil” as “light against dark.” Religious writers of the Protestant Reformation called the Dark Ages the age of Catholic corruption, while the 16th and 17th Century Catholic writers countered that the High Middle Ages was a period of social and religious harmony. As usual, there are two sides to every story.

Sadly, there is a dawning Dark Age that could be deadlier than any plague or rampant disease in the Middle Ages–  it is the belief that vaccinations are bad!  Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence that vaccinations control deadly outbreaks, prevent suffering and death, there is a growing group of the uninitiated parents and caregivers that argue that vaccinations are amoral, unethical, and dangerous.  And many of these arguments involve religion.  When Reverend Cotton Mather introduced inoculations in Boston in 1721 during a smallpox epidemic, most people rejected it on religious grounds. In 1772, theologian Edmund Massey argued that diseases were sent by God to punish sinners.  He stated any injection to prevent smallpox was a “diabolical operation.” Not much has changed since the 18th Century, particularly with the non-Christian religions. For instance, fundamentalist Muslims who advise their followers not to be inoculated are responsible for a resurgence of polio.

But anti-vaccine supporters cannot live on religion alone.  To sway the masses, “scientific” facts and studies must be quoted to convince logical, thinking human beings, even if there is no basis for such conclusions.  Celebrity helps a lot as seen in the number of anti-vaxxer followers of former Playboy bunny, Jenny McCarthy.  McCarthy, who believes her son is autistic due to a measles/mumps/rubella vaccination (MMR), bases her belief on what was deemed fraudulent research perpetrated by an English doctor, Andrew Wakefield (actually Wakefield is a supporter of single vaccines).  Celebrities, such as McCarthy and Robert Kennedy, Jr., are creating an unnecessary medical crisis by using their notoriety and status to reduce the number of parents who vaccinate their children.  And it’s working.  A 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana was a result of parents refusing to inoculate their children against the disease.  But rising above the health horizon is an even more dangerous argument called vaccine overload.

Vaccine overload is the idea that young bodies can be given too many vaccines in too short of a period of time.  Proponents convince themselves that a child’s immune system is too weak for so many vaccinations and that the consequences can be severe, including the new medical buzz word for the neural development disorder known as autism.

Recently, a gentleman named Jack Collins wrote me to discuss the following video, and he thought that you and I might find it interesting.  He’s correct!  You will find it interesting, but before you watch it, these few facts and definitions may be helpful:

An antigen is substance, usually a toxin, that enters the body and triggers it to produce an antibody to fight it.  Most common antigens are live bacteria or viruses and this antibody mechanism is a crucial step in keeping us healthy and alive.  The video is entitled “Too Many, Too Soon: The Anti-Vaccine Fallacy” and is posted on academicearth.org.  Please watch!

Created by AcademicEarth.org

Posted in Celebrity and Fame, Real life, Religion, Science | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Dark Age of Modern Medicine!

Les Miserable, North Carolina Style!

In a sinister Dallas McKinnon voice (Courageous Cat, Gumby and Archie) comes the words, “This is the scene of the crime!”  The crime?  Stolen Pop Tarts!  The culprit?  A mother’s son!  In a bizarre world, nothing can surprise us now as you view the video below:

Besides the obvious, there are a few things disturbing about this modern day version of Les Miserable.  First and foremost, of course, is a mother who would risk giving her son a criminal record (this crime is a misdemeanor) for eating something in his own home.  Second is the fact that the police entertained this stupid call, wasting hundreds of dollars of taxpayers money on a matter that’s dumber than the woman who called 9-1-1 because McDonald’s was out of Chicken McNuggets.  The third disturbing fact is that a local television station added credence to this story by sending out an elder statesman to report on the incident, which begs the question, “Do you think that guy’s career is in the crapper?”

At any rate, it is a sad commentary on life in the United States, where mothers, police and television reporters have nothing better to do set themselves up as the laughing stock of the world.  The sad, sad part is what this might do the the master mind criminal himself.  In a world where most mother’s hide their children even after a murder, it’s nice to know there are others willingly to junk a child’s future because she can’t discipline her own child.  I’m sure in the “made-for-TV-movie,”  Jean Valjean’s line will be changed to “I stole a box of Pop Tarts!”  It’s fortunate the young man didn’t steal a loaf of bread, because as expensive as bread is today, he’d be charged with a felony.

Posted in Law and our society!, Real life, Ripped from the headlines | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Les Miserable, North Carolina Style!

It’s a Clean, Clean, Clean, Clean World!

This spring during an outdoor rowing event, I noticed everyone using a bottle of hand sanitizer on the edge of a picnic table.  It was a pump-type dispenser and was in constant use as athletes, parents, and coaches were inclined to reach down, give it a push and rub a clear, cold dab of the stuff between their hands.  Invented in 1988 by the family-owned soap company, Purell, the hand cleaner boosted sales of other Purell products, but the new alcohol-laced cleanser itself didn’t sell very well.  Now the little pump bottles pop up everywhere– schools, hospitals, businesses, airports and airplanes.  The “human versus germ” is a hand washing, kitchen countertop cleansing battleground that is its own epidemic.  Even George W. Bush was dubbed a racist for dabbing a little of stuff after a Barack Obama handshake.  It begs the question, “Are we too clean?”  With the boundary of clean versus dirty sliding ever so toward a dead and disinfected world, are we in danger of destroying ourselves?

There is a tale about a village in Scotland that massacred all the wolves in the area because shepherds were losing some sheep, however, in a short while, rats overran the village for there were no wolves to feed on the rats.  The village imported wolves to restore the natural balance, accepting the fact that a few sheep needed to be sacrificed to keep the village safe from a flood of rats.  Are we creating our own bacteriological bag of rats?

The problem began with children.  In the not-so-far-distant past, children were not all the rage they are today.  No one thought his or her little brat was the next earth savior and let it behave as if the undisciplined spawn was the next antichrist.  Children were seen and not heard, and there was a good reason for this.  It was an adult world with adult problems and children just weren’t included.  Children were free to go out into the yard, get filthy and hopefully return so exhausted they could be dumped into bed. Adults didn’t worry about what their kids were doing every minute of every day.  Kids had things to do . . . kid things!  Adults were busy drinking, smoking, and doing evil stuff . . . adult stuff!  Then things changed.  Baby boomers found out that germs make people sick and even die!

Now, the word “germ” is a misnomer, as there is really no such thing as a germ.  What makes us ill is a general group of critters known as bacteria and another group even tinier called viruses.  Most of these guys don’t even bother us, and many are actually beneficial, so the group that is nasty to humankind is deemed pathogens, which is Greek for “producer of suffering.”  Today, many of these pathogens can be controlled in the body by using certain drugs, but the “well educated” baby boomers found out that they could wipe out the pesky critters with preemptive attacks.  Like the Texas State School Board wiping out human evolution textbooks, they started sanitizing the world.  First, though, they would need to sterilize their most precious possession, the little demon seeds they call their own.  No more mud pies, rolling in the grass, or petting the cat!  These things became taboo in the new world order of germ-free America!

Once newscasters convinced the baby boomers that someone was out to capture their kids, the battle plan was complete!  Don’t let children out of the house!  That’ll keep them safe, where they can breathe in dust mites, play video games, eat chips and get fat.  Oh yes, we’ll slather them with alcohol-laced products on the outside while huffing and stamping our feet about the evils of using alcohol-laced products on the inside.  The battle cry “The only good bacterium is a dead bacterium!” was born.  But the battle cry is all wrong.

Our body is full of bacteria fighting for the delicate balance of good “germs” versus “bad” to maintain the condition we call healthy.  Without our normally invisible friends, there would be no yogurt, sauerkraut or cheese.  During our normal lives, particularly when we are young, exposure to all types of bacteria help us to become stronger by developing immunities to such critters.  Most bacteria living in our background, that is, around the house and in the backyard, are not bio-safety level 4.

More dangerous is the fact that bacteria and viruses, like most living things, are designed to survive.  They do that by adapting, or mutating, into a life form that can survive.  This means they develop into drug-resistant little critters that can’t be easily killed, making them an ever stronger and increasing more dangerous.  This science fiction scenario is quickly becoming a reality as we spray, wash and wipe down everything and anything with alcohol and other dandy poisons.  How do we reverse this trend?  Prudently wash your hands with ordinary soap and water, shower daily, cook your food thoroughly when required (a rare steak or burger won’t kill an adult if the meat is fresh and handled properly) and let your kid play in the dirt.  Feed your kid peanuts when he’s young, and just wash him or her up at the end of the day, much like you do with your lawnmower.  Give the good bacteria a chance!

Posted in Fantasy Fun, Real life, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on It’s a Clean, Clean, Clean, Clean World!